The Conscientious (R)evolution
DEPROGRAMMING LEVEL 1
Slave on slave
The holistic sequence is used every day to trick everyone against their better self by redirecting and taking ownership of their thoughts, emotions and actions. It makes people believe that they're acting right and feel good about themselves. That, is holistic programming.
Deprogramming level 1 focuses on common activities that involve social interaction, such as shopping, healthcare, watching TV and voting. I call it "slave on slave" because it involves people preying on each other without realizing they themselves are slaves.
To illustrate how the holistic sequence is applied with the intent to deceive, I will use stereotypical social behavior. It may be a little repetitive, but it's necessary for the pattern to emerge. Try to focus your attention on the underlying dynamics taking place.
| Mind | Spirit | Body |
The shopper
- Q: Is it true that you believed the marketer's claim that his product would make your life better?
- A: Yes, it is true. He said that purchasing his new technology would help me beat my eggs without much effort.
- Q: Is it true that the marketer made you feel good about buying the product?
- A: Yes, it is true. He showed me pictures of smiley people using the product and said I had to act fast.
- Q: Is it true that you purchased the product because you believed his claim and you were afraid of missing out?
- A: Yes, it is true. I purchased the product with a credit card so I could take advantage of this opportunity to make my life better and feel like the smiley people on the pictures.
So you accepted the marketer’s claims because you had no prior knowledge and did not do reasonable research about it. You replaced knowledge with belief, and bypassed your Mind. Then fear of missing out replaced care, such as caring enough to do that initial research or caring that you’re putting yourself in debt for a product you may not need. Finally, you took action and purchased the product, without ascertaining whether it was a wise action.
We see this every day. If the marketer’s claims are true, there’s no problem. If they’re not true, it’s a wrong use of the holistic sequence and it says much about his character.
The patient
- Q: Is it true that your doctor told you the only way to solve your menstrual problems was to get a hysterectomy?
- A: Yes, it is true. She said hysterectomy is the solution and did not give me any natural options.
- Q: Is it true that your doctor implied it needed to be done sooner than later or else?
- A: Yes, it is true. She said if I didn’t do it soon, it may become cancerous and I should do it now that I still have insurance.
- Q: Is it true that because you didn’t know of other options and because of fear, you had the hysterectomy?
- A: Yes, it is true. I didn’t have a choice. I got the surgery because she told me that's what I needed to do and she’s in charge of my health and I was afraid it could get worse.
First of all, you had a choice; you always have a choice. Second, your health is your property. That means you’re in charge of it, not your doctor.
So here, we have the typical conventional doctor selling to the patient a surgery she doesn’t need. I know from clinical experience that only about ten percent of surgeries are actually medically necessary; hence the term “elective.” That term is in fact quite revealing, because it implies that the patients wants the surgery, instead of needing it, after being "talked" into buying it.
In this case, the doctor captures the Mind of the patient by using her perceived authority to tell the patient that the solution is surgery while conveniently omitting natural options offered elsewhere. Because the patient is in distress from her existing symptoms, she accepts the presented solution without second thought. The MD then captures the Spirit of the patient by instilling fear and pretending that there’s urgency, both medically and financially. The patient accepts her fate and the doctor captures the patient's Body by performing the surgery.
Here, I’m putting the blame on both the deceiving doctor and the credulous patient. I am also increasing the seriousness of the harm caused, compared to the marketer’s example above; tricking someone into buying something is not as evil as tricking someone into getting surgery. The patient is partly responsible for not doing her research but let's keep in mind she's the victim. I will put both of them to the test of the conscience formula later on.
The TV watcher
Sometimes a problem is created intentionally as a means to an end, as with the concept of false flags. When an event is called a false flag, it means that there’s a certain level of deception behind the reasons for which it happened.
In this example, a catastrophic terrorist event is initiated so as to create a strong enough reaction in popular opinion to pass legislation and start a war.
- Q: Is it true that there are inconsistencies in the narrative surrounding the events of September 11, 2001?
- A: Yes, it is true. We know now that the motives of the terrorists, the buildings and the laws of physics do not match the proposed narrative.
- Q: Is it true that the events of 9/11 created anger, sadness and fear in the Spirit of the American people?
- A: Yes, it is true. People were deeply affected, some of which missed work while others retaliated against local minorities as a result.
- Q: Is it true that the American people demanded action from their government to make America safer and find those who had done it?
- A: Yes, it is true. The US Government subsequently passed the Patriot Act and went to war in the Middle East.
This process has been described by different analysts, and instead of using their terminology, I will just take you through its steps.
Purpose: how to do something for oneself at the expense of others, while making them think they are doing it for themselves.
- Define the initial intent or desired outcome
- Create a problem that will induce an expected reaction
- Watch for affect, stages of grief and demands for answers
- Feed a misleading narrative to the deceived
- Offer solutions based on initial intent
- Implement the desired outcome
So once the problem is created, the Mind is hijacked with the false narrative. The Mind then remains in a state of belief and is supported by the Spirit, itself destabilized by emotional affect. This makes people vulnerable and quick to react without any desire to validate the narrative or think about the consequence of their actions. Finally, the Body is co-opted by voting, supporting, and funding government action and implementing the initial intent of going to war while restricting domestic freedoms.
The voter
With this example, I will introduce the concept of dialectic by which the control system keeps people distracted and divided. It illustrates the use of the holistic sequence of thought, emotion and action from both sides of the dialectic simultaneously. It would be a good textbook example but one that is too perfectly synchronized to occur in real life. However, it works well here for illustrative purposes.
Because it engages the man-woman dialectic, the answers (A) have both man and woman versions.
- Q: Is it true that you typically position yourself politically based on social issues if you're a woman, and on universal principles if you're a man?
- A: Yes, as a woman, I think (feel) that social issues involving people, particularly women and minorities, are more important. Yes, as a man, I think universal matters are more important than social issues.
- Q: Is it true that as a woman, you are emotionally attached to the idea of social programs because it resonates with your maternal instinct; but as a man and provider, you'd rather keep the fruit of your labor?
- A: Yes, it is true. As a woman, the emotion of care comes before the logistics of how to fund it. And as a man, the logistics of providing for my family take precedent over helping others.
- Q: Is it true that you vote Left as a woman and Right as a man?
- A: Yes, it is true. I vote Left because I am a woman and I care about helping others. I vote Right because I am a man and I want to keep the fruit of my labor for my family, not let government redistribute it.
The dialectics combined here are: Right vs. Left; man vs. woman; universal principles vs. social issues; individualism vs. collectivism. You may have recognized these dialectics in action during the Trump vs. Hillary campaigns in 2016 and the Trump vs. Kamala campaigns in 2024. As a personal note from a foreign-born American citizen, I could not understand American politics until I understood these dialectics.
So here, we distinguish the male Mind, which is more rationally based, and the female Mind, which is actually more her Spirit, and is more emotionally based. These traits are rooted in natural law and the manifestation on the physical plane of the sacred male and female energies, then adapted to life on earth. They are perfect, and you can't change them. The Left uses these differences to attract women, while men just drift to the Right in the way of the classic phrase: "the political world is made of two types of people: those who want to be left alone and those who won't leave them alone." By the way, let it be known that I do not position myself on either side. You'll understand why later.
The polarization we see today is due to a political system that manipulates otherwise healthy and complementary dialectics to make people believe, feel and act against one another. But who is behind it and why? This is what you'll find out in Deprogramming Level 2.
Cui bono?
